Just Aircraft Highlander experimental amateurbuilt light sport aircraft
Experimental Aircraft News Magazine - Just Aircraft introduced their new Highlander in the summer of ’04, marketing the model as an “upgrade” to their Escapade. Just Aircraft positioned the Highlander as a bushplane. It has an extended wing with vortex generators that increase low-speed performance, a larger elevator and rudder, heavy-duty gear, large wheels and brakes, and an 8-inch Maule tailwheel. The Highlander is also manufactured with attach points for floats, lots of cabin area, and an extra-large, 34-cubic-foot cargo area.
In ’05, one more change happened that moved the Idaho company quite literally across the country. Woodland found a new partner, Gary Schmitt, and a new opportunity in the Southeast. Woodland said, in the short span of a couple weeks, he went home to Idaho and told the company’s Western employees, “Pack your bags and sell your houses. We’re moving to South Carolina.” Amazingly, about half of them took the offer and moved, giving the relocated company a continuity of knowledge and experience.
Just Aircraft is now headquartered in new facilities in the small town of Walhalla, South Carolina, which is in the northwestern corner of the state.
Just Aircraft Highlander
When I had the chance to fly the Highlander in the spring of ’05, I didn’t fly in a factory plane or with a factory pilot. Instead I flew with Sam Peachey, the aircraft’s owner and builder, and a Pennsylvania customer who used Just Aircraft’s Builder Assistance Program to create his Highlander.
A former Amish man who rode a horse and trailer until he was 17 years old, Peachey lives in Pennsylvania on an 87-acre farm with a 1,300-foot airstrip. He flew the Highlander down to Florida from his home state.
Peachey also has two daughters, both of whom learned to operate taildraggers in this Highlander. Peachey trained both his girls before handing them off to an instructor to complete their training. One of his daughters, Carol, joined him in Florida. Peachey’s Highlander was nicely equipped, including an EFIS system and a Garmin 296 moving map GPS (on top of the panel). His EFIS had airspeed and altimeter information in addition to a large range of engine information. Besides these electronic instruments, Peachey precisely installed an array of “steam gauges” providing an analog backup to the digital devices.
Trim and flaps controls are between the seats for easy access by either occupant. The trim control is just to the left of the flap handle. Trim proved quite responsive, especially when putting the nose down.
The flap lever offers three positions with push-button detents. Flaps are discreet; they are not flaperons as has been common on Avids and Kitfoxes that preceded the Highlander. A fuel shut-off lever is positioned on the floor in front of the flap handle. The starting procedure called for both master switches to be on; they were positioned on the right side of the panel alongside switches for the strobe light, nav lights, and landing lights.
Above the key start switches on the panel’s left side are two more switches. An unlabeled one is for a fan to circulate cabin heating. To the right of it is a map light; we didn’t need either of these switches.
To stop the engine, simply retard the throttle and switch it off via the key switch, then flip off the master switch.
The Highlander seats have some fore and aft adjustment to accommodate occupants of different sizes. The windows open separately from the doors, using two latches. You may have either the door open or the window open in flight. Any time you wish, you may open and close either windows or doors, a feature I appreciated.
The door is held open with a gas piston, which is mounted only on the door’s aft side. This is a good location as you are unlikely to bump it with your head, but I worried that the door might be negatively affected by having its only support at the rear. It turns out I had no reason to worry; the doors stayed securely in place when we opened them. While you may open the doors or windows in flight, you’ll probably want to slow the Highlander down first or the wind force inside the cabin may be significant.
Just Aircraft Highlander Experimental Amateurbuilt Aircraft Images
Both the clear turtle deck and skylight let lots of light into the cabin. They also allow you to see above and ahead in turns, if sufficiently banked.
A 34-cubic-foot storage area is provided behind the seats, and the factory indicated the seats could fold forward or could be laid all the way back to form a bed. Just Aircraft also reports, “The seats are also adjustable to fit pilots 5 feet tall to 6 feet, 8 inches tall.” For my average 5-foot, 10-inch height, the cockpit seemed spacious and the reach to all controls was very acceptable.
Bushy Bird
In upgrading the Escapade to the Highlander, Just Aircraft gave the aircraft more power, wing features to help it take off and land slower, and a sturdier gear system with large tires and wheels. They also fitted hydraulic brakes that offered quite a strong slowing force.
Just Aircraft says the Highlander has “6-foot, 6-inch center-to-center landing gear, and a tough bungee cord suspension system.” On South Lakeland Air Park’s turf runway, I didn’t get the chance to test the Highlander’s bushplane capability but it did provide a comfortable ride that absorbed the undulations of a sandy soil. It also offered excellent ground clearance for bush operations since the gear is extended in length.
Just Aircraft Highlander Experimental Amateurbuilt Aircraft Video
As we prepared for takeoff, we watched for the exhaust gas temperatures to come up before adding throttle; they did so quickly in Florida’s April warmth. Peachey’s plane was not fitted with a water temperature gauge often used for this purpose. With 100 horses pulling this light airplane (empty weight is only 600 pounds, less than most light-sport aircraft), takeoff was rapid. The factory states 300 feet when dual – and only 130 feet when solo – and my experience suggested this was truthful. Landings would later prove again the low-speed characteristics of the Highlander’s vortex generator-equipped wing as we rolled out in the same runway length as had been used for takeoff.
Conditions were rather variable with 15-mph winds gusting to 20 or 25 mph. We landed straight into the wind so the velocity wasn’t much of a factor. Through the airborne rowdiness, the Highlander showed strong control authority. Though the flaps did all the work of slowing this slow-speed-capable design, the Highlander also permitted good slips to landing. The powerful controls allowed me to get the airplane positioned with a large sideways angle that used the fuselage to pull the airplane down toward the runway. However, after the landing where slipping was used, the door popped open on downwind as the latch didn’t have quite enough friction. Peachey says this is an easy fix.
In addition to qualifying the Highlander as a bushplane by using beefy gear and tires, Just Aircraft enhanced the upgraded model by installing a larger balanced elevator and rudder plus a larger trim tab. These changes help accommodate slow-speed handling when landing in smaller spaces that one might find when bush flying.
As I flew Peachey’s Highlander, my hand felt comfortable resting on my leg, though this meant I had to hold the joystick below the actual grip handle. The light touch needed to maneuver the airplane meant this hand position presented no hardship. In slow flight I was able to hold the Highlander at just above stall or about 43 to 44 mph with full flaps extended. During this exercise only 4,400 rpm was needed. The roll rate slowed considerably as would be expected, but response remained very acceptable.
The airplane exhibited a very strong roll rate, though the rudder pedals were a little on the heavy side compared to the joystick. Sometimes such lack of perfect harmony can be fixed with linkage adjustments. Because of dissimilarity of control pressures between the rudder pedals and stick, my Dutch rolls were not as smooth as I’d have preferred. However, this situation is not uncommon for a responsive aircraft. In fact, I believe the Highlander is considerably better than what I found on early Kitfox models I flew. In those older airplanes, keeping the ball in the center while doing any turns, much less Dutch rolls, proved fairly challenging.
High-Performance Highlander
Powered by the 100-hp Rotax 912S engine – compared to the 80-hp Escapade I’d flown earlier – the Highlander seemed much more spirited even though it weighs a few pounds more (somewhat due to its heavier landing gear and tires). As noted earlier, takeoffs consumed very little runway and climb was strong at about 1,000 fpm (the turbulent day made accurate measurements very difficult).
Aloft at 4,600 rpm we were seeing 85 to 87 mph. I liked flying around at 4,600 rpm, part of my search for low noise and vibration power settings. Peachey agreed this is a very efficient power setting that saves fuel. At a higher power setting of 5,400 rpm, we saw a shade over 100 mph and Peachey indicated his trimmed Highlander would cruise at about 105 mph at cross-country altitudes. This matches Just Aircraft’s published figures perfectly.
Like the Avid and Kitfox predecessors, the Highlander’s wing uses quite a bit of undercamber, which may account for its slower cruising speeds. But this same quality contributes to its good slow-speed characteristics and some say this helps the handling remain light and responsive.
I saw stalls at 42 mph indicated while the factory states, “33-mph clean stall” and “27-mph stall with flaps.” Unlike their dead-on cruise speed numbers, Just Aircraft’s published stall speed figures appeared to have significant error. However, this could be because the installed ASI was off by a good margin (such is actually quite common), or because my technique was that different from a highly accomplished factory pilot.
On the plus side, all stall characteristics were good. Accelerated stalls broke out level in each direction, though such turning stalls went the opposite way somewhat past level when performed in a right-hand turn. I didn’t detect anything that seemed threatening in any of the stalls, and all stalls were recovered without adding power.
The Highlander revealed the expected amount of adverse yaw for a responsive aircraft. This result was a little more emphasized to the left than the right, no doubt a function of propeller P-factor. The delay in coming around was a bit longer to the left. My evaluation of longitudinal stability also turned out well. After setting cruise power and assuring level trim, I lowered the nose and released. While the leveling response took somewhat longer than I expected, the Highlander did not bob back and forth through several oscillations as is common even in highly stable aircraft; it quickly came back to a stable attitude.
When I raised the nose and released, the Highlander never lowered the nose much, but it did move back and forth, seeking its trim position. The difference between this and the previous longitudinal stability trial may be little more than my precision at trimming. As mentioned earlier in this article, the trim was quite responsive with a rather coarse amount of input precision. I may have not had the Highlander as precisely trimmed as I’d like.
What’ll It Be?
The fuselage comes prewelded in powder-coated 4130 chromoly steel. The factory says completing the Highlander kit should take the average builder between 400 and 600 hours to finish. They say they often have kits currently ready for delivery.
One of the most popular features of the Kitfox-type designs is the quick-folding wings (even if buyers often don’t use the capability). The Highlander continues this tradition and factory personnel say the wings can be folded in less than 2 minutes without disconnecting control linkages or surfaces. Even the Pitot/static air system disconnects easily and quickly.
If a taildragger isn’t your preference, both the Escapade and Highlander offer a choice between tailwheel or tricycle landing gear, and both are said to be “an easy swap.”
Of course, a Just Aircraft kit, fitting the parameters of LSA as it does, can be flown with a Sport Pilot certificate. For many sport pilots, the Highlander makes an excellent flying choice in the bushplane theme. Its kit pricing puts the aircraft within the budget of a large number of pilots. Will one of them be you?
Just Aircraft Highlander
Seating 2, side-by-side
Empty weight 600 pounds
Gross weight 1,320 pounds
Wingspan 31 feet 5 inches
Wing area 120.75 square feet
Wing loading 10.9 pounds per square foot
Length 19 feet
Cabin Interior 44 inches wide
Height 7 feet, 10 inches
Kit type Construction kit
Airworthiness Certified SLSA
Build time 400-600 hours
Standard engine Rotax 912S
Power 100 hp
Power loading 13.2 pounds/hp
Cruise speed 105 mph
Never exceed speed 130 mph
Rate of climb at gross 1,000 fpm
Takeoff distance at gross 300 feet
Landing distance at gross 250 feet
Standard Features Two side-by-side seats, full enclosure with doors on both sides, doors and windows open separately, skylight, folding wings, push-button flaps, steerable tailwheel, 18-gallon fuel tank, 4-point pilot restraints, large tires, trim, heavy-duty bungee-suspension gear.
Options Powder-coated fuselage weldment, quick-build wings, flaps and ailerons, hydraulic toe brakes, electric trim, tinted Lexan for windows and skylight, lighting kit, interior finish kits, spinner, nosewheel conversion kit.
Construction Factory-welded steel fuselage, wood wing ribs, fiberglass cowling, instrument panel, wing tips, dope-and-fabric wing coverings. Made in the USA.
Design
Cosmetic appearance, structural integrity, achievement of design goals, effectiveness of aerodynamics, ergonomics.
Pros – Just Aircraft’s Highlander is built bushplane-capable, a stouter version of their Escapade. Established American design shape with side-by-side seating useful for training. Well-proven configuration and construction with light, responsive handling and performance. Welded steel fuselage.
Cons – Taildraggers aren’t for everyone (if so, order the optional nosewheel kit). Just Aircraft has yet to make clear their LSA ambitions or plans (though their aircraft can be built as kits and flown with a Sport Pilot certificate).
Systems
Subsystems available to pilot such as: Flaps; Fuel sources; Electric start; In-air restart; Brakes; Engine controls; Navigations; Radio; (items covered may be optional).
Pros – The Highlander comes well-equipped with electric starting, 3-notch button-detent flap handle, directional brakes, and dual center sticks. Trim lever located between seats alongside flap handle. Large instrument panel has plenty of room for radios or extra gauges.
Cons – Trim control was too coarse for precise setting; a longer lever or more gradual linkage would be better. Four-stroke engine generates higher purchase cost, especially when paired with a 3-blade composite prop. Fueling is on top of wing, requiring a ladder or step.
Cockpit/Cabin
Instrumentation; Ergonomics of controls; Creature comforts; (items covered may be optional).
Pros – The Highlander offers a roomy cabin with outward bulging windows. Excellent upward visibility through skylight and clear turtle deck. Seats adjust fore and aft. Entry to either seat is easy. Well-finished interior. Large cargo area. Doors can open in flight; windows float upward and stay put.
Cons – Clear doors and windows aren’t sufficient for those who desire solid structure around them. Door latch popped open in the pattern after a hard slip to a touch-and-go landing. Interior is rather utilitarian. Cargo area lacks good tie-down provisions.
Ground Handling
Taxi visibility; Steering; Turn radius; Shock absorption; Stance/Stability; Braking.
Pros – Tailwheel steering was responsive even on sandy, turf runway. Powerful hydraulic brakes are mounted to both sets of rudder pedals. Wide wheel stance and stout bungee shock absorbers. Large ground clearance, fitting a bushplane. Excellent upward visibility to check traffic.
Cons – Large tires add quite a bit of bounce that can aggravate poor touchdown technique. While taxiing, visibility over the nose is somewhat restricted as on most taildraggers. Taildragger pilots have to keep their feet moving on rudder pedals at near takeoff or landing speeds.
Takeoff/Landing
Qualities; Efficiency; Ease; Comparative values.
Pros – Climb is as strong as expected with 100-hp Rotax 912S engine; solo ground roll is less than 150 feet. Excellent visibility around you at all times. Flaps were quite effective at controlling approach path steepness; slips are also effective. Authoritative aileron response. Slow-speed capabilities (thanks partly to vortex generators) are great.
Cons – All taildraggers have some extra requirements on takeoffs and landings; pilots must stay active on rudder pedals without overdoing it. No other negatives.
Control
Quality and quantity for: Coordination; Authority; Pressures; Response; and Coupling.
Pros – Better handling qualities for most pilots compared to pioneering Avid and Kitfox designs of this configuration. Light, reasonably fast, authoritative controls were very agreeable. Good control authority for coping with crosswinds or performing slips to landing.
Cons – Aileron and rudder harmony was not perfect; rudder pedals were heavier than rather light aileron response. Trim control was too sensitive to assure a fine setting. Pilots not used to rudders will need to acquire new skills for taildragger operations.
Performance
Climb; Glide; Sink; Cruise/stall/max speeds; Endurance; Range; Maneuverability.
Pros – Fuel consumption plus noise and vibration are good with the Rotax 912 4-stroke engine common to light-sport aircraft. Wing design benefits slow-speed performance (resulting in quick takeoffs and short landings). Cruise is comfortably over 100 mph, even at medium throttle settings.
Cons – Climb is not quite as strong as expected with the 100-hp Rotax 912S. Pilots seeking the fastest cruising LSA will have to look elsewhere; the Highlander is instead optimized for bushplane operations (which it does very well). No other negatives.
Stability
Stall recovery and characteristics; Dampening; Spiral stability; Adverse yaw qualities.
Pros – Stall speeds were reasonably slow (though not as low as factory specs; see article). Accelerated stalls rolled level in either direction. Longitudinal power response was positive, returning to level without oscillation. Four-point pilot restraints for both seats.
Cons – Disturb the joystick fore or aft at trim and the Highlander returned to level somewhat slowly (though positively). Rudder pedals felt slightly heavier than ailerons (though once a pilot gets used to it or linkages are adjusted to harmonize, the problem should disappear).
Overall
Addresses the questions: “Will a buyer get what he/she expects to buy, and did the designer/builder achieve the chosen goal?”
Pros – The Highlander is effectively a third-generation Just Aircraft model and it shows: performance and handling plus rugged bushplane looks without the higher price and complexity of many LSA. Folding wings may help storage at crowded airports with high hangar prices. Kit options keep the Highlander closer to many pilots’ budgets.
Cons – 400 to 600 hours build time. Painting and finishing can add significantly.
Subscribe To The Ultralight Flyer Web Video Magazine.
Yearly Subscription To The Light Sport And Ultralight Flyer Web Video Magazine! ONLY $29.95. U.S.
Your subscription includes Rotax 582, and HKS aircraft engine rebuilding videos, which are EACH nearly 2 hours in length! PLUS hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of web video interviews with designers, manufactures, builders, and suppliers of ultralight light and light sport aircraft parts and accessories.